Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +416%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
6144
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy