NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+1211%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro 410
136
Quadro K5200
+1423%
2072
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
38W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK110B
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
