NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+744%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
38W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
