NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+721%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
142W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
