NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+370%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
