NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3354%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
142W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
