NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+4962%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA107S
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
