NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+3189%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK110B
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
