NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
GRID K100
+201%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
