NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+2269%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
TU102
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
