NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q
+442%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK104
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
