NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
+29%
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK107
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
