Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +5219%
14.31 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
46
96
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GA104
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net