NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2550MHz vs 1440MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
9216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+532%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
100
3584
Shading Units
12800
224
TMUs
400
96
ROPs
176
224
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
