NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+760%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
