NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+363%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
96
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
