NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+12800%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tesla
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0
