AMD P30PH vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P30PH and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P30PH
+597%
4.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2100 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
268.8GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2048
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 20
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
