AMD P30PH vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P30PH and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P30PH
+394%
4.94 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2100 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
268.8GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 20
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
