NVIDIA P106 100 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1709MHz
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P106 100
4.375 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+143%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
6.1
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
