Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2175MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +150%
26.73 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
160bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
25
SM Count
48
3200
Shading Units
6144
200
TMUs
192
80
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
AD104
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net