Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2250MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +115%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
25
SM Count
40
3200
Shading Units
5120
200
TMUs
160
80
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
AD104
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net