NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+30%
10.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
4096
200
TMUs
256
80
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Fiji
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
