NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+790%
10.69 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
800
200
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV770
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
