NVIDIA P102 101 vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+304%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1600
200
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cypress
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
