NVIDIA P102 101 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+475%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
May 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1280
200
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cayman
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
