Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro S9050

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 10GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +231%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1792
200
TMUs
112
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net