NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro S10000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1670MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+213%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1792
200
TMUs
112
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Zaphod
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
