NVIDIA P102 101 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3160 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+33306%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
40
200
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
0 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV620
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
