Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1683MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +1236%
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

25
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
3200
Shading Units
384
200
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Oland
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy