NVIDIA P102 100 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 100
+10670%
10.77 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1582 MHz
Base Clock
-
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
25
SM Count
1
3200
Shading Units
48
200
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GF119
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
