Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +434%
10.77 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
-
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1440
200
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Cypress
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net