NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
+399%
1.199 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
747 MHz
-
Boost Clock
937 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
5
96
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GP107
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
