NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
+390%
1.177 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
3
96
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GP108
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
