NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1189MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce MX130
+280%
0.913 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1109 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GM108
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
Unknown
116 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
