Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V7750

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 76W)
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750 +412%
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV730
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
76W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy