Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40 +3382%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
NVS
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy