Moore Threads MTT S50 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM MTT S50 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
MTT S50
4.915 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1228%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
SM Count
100
2048
Shading Units
12800
128
TMUs
400
128
ROPs
176
Tensor Cores
400
RT Cores
100
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
153.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
153.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
9.830 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
4.915 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
