Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+200%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
175W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
