Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +1147%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
896
512
TMUs
56
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
115W
850 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net