Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+329%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
512
TMUs
144
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
250W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
22 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
