Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +388%
24.58 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
8192
Shading Units
1408
512
TMUs
88
512
ROPs
48
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
125W
850 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net