Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +466%
24.58 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
8192
Shading Units
1280
512
TMUs
40
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
250W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net