Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +319%
65.28 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
4096
Shading Units
12800
256
TMUs
400
256
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net