Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+721%
15.56 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
