Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
+235%
52.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
2295 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
4096
Shading Units
10240
256
TMUs
320
256
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
320W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
