Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 403.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +6%
10.65 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 16 GB
9.999 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
256
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net