Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 4.256GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1550 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 150W)

Score

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2007
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.256GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.808 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.808 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.107 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net