Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock1845MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +104%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
5.196 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net