Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Boost Clock1645MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+129%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
4.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
